Case Notes
History
71 year old male presenting with acute onset slurred or muffled speech, no weakness, was able to understand speech, with no loss of consciousness.Exam
2 minute delayed post contrast head CTA with: analysis of pial collateralization, plus a comparative analysis of the CT density within the venocapillary pool (using the initial and delayed post contrast CTA’s), plus an analysis of venous egress. This part of the CTA is referred to as either the delayed post contrast CTA or the 2nd pass CTA, since it is performed after the 2nd contrast bolus. It has the benefit of recirculation effects, and twice the contrast load, as the initial post contrast head CTA. The delayed post contrast CTA is used to detect distal pial collateralization and to assess the CT-density within the parenchymal venocapillary pool, which provides the best CTA evidence of ischemic injury.
Purposes
1. To identify any, and all, sites of intracranial afferent block (either occlusion or combination of tandem stenosis and an incomplete circle of Willis);
2. To determine whether the observed pial collateral gap observed on the CTA head finally reaches the proximal thrombus on the delayed post contrast CTA head (considered fair collateral). However, this tissue may still be at risk for ischemic injury;
3. If the a pial collateral gap remains on the delayed post contrast head CTA, then tissue within the gap will likely be in the dense ischemic core and become a completed stroke (ischemic cascade plus glutamate cascade leading to liquefactive necrosis or sequestered infarct or both).
4. Given there is observably reasonable pial collateral, it does NOT ensure that there is perfusion of the underlying tissue. To assess whether the existing pial collateral actually perfuses the underlying brain parenchyma, a comparative analysis is made between the CT contrast density within the venocapillary pool in the affected region on the initial post contrast CTA with the CT density on the delayed post contrast CTA, and that is compared to unaffected comparable region on the contra lateral side. At-risk tissue (ischemic penumbra) will exhibit a partial rise in CT density between the 1st and the 2nd post contrast CTA, but it will not reach normal range compared to unaffected brain. Tissue that shows little or no rise in CT density in the venocapillary pool will be within the dense ischemic core. The areas of significantly reduced & absent parenchymal contrast CT density are at higher risk of hemorrhagic conversion upon reperfusion (spontaneous or therapeutic). Note: analysis of the CT density in the venocapillary pool and CT perfusion are both approximations of tissue actual perfusion based on changes in concentration of the contrast media in tissue over time. Thus, an initial short-term high depth-duration oligemic event can occur, initiating the ischemic cascade. But the afferent block can quickly clear, which means tissue injury can be initiated, but the antegrade blood flow is restored. In this circumstance, tissue injury will have occurred, but the restroration of pial blood flow will appear as normal or near normal on both the CT perfusion and the CT density within the venocapillary pool. Thus, both the CTA and CT perfusion may underestimate tissue injury, which is why the stroke protocol MR is of value, since actual tissue injury will always show up, in some fashion, on MR diffusion sequences.
5. Given there is an ICA stenosis/occlusion, is there effective EC-IC collateral;
6. In the context of restricted intradural afferent arterial blood flow obstruction (in the absence of a primary stem occlusion), has regional hypoperfusion produced oligemia in the expected anastomotic border zones producing a watershed stroke pattern;
7. In the context of an ICA thrombosis, tandem stenoses, incomplete portions of circle of Willis, or a combination of these, is there a shift in the location of the anastomotic border zones such that oligemia produces an end-of the-line watershed stroke pattern. Low flow ischemia within the end-of the-line portion of a shifted watershed can account strokes that involve tissue not primarily affected by the thrombus.
8. To evaluate the state of venous egress, at least for the major veins (note: SWI is the most effective of assessing flow in the deep parenchymal medullary veins).
Purposes
1. To identify any, and all, sites of intracranial afferent block (either occlusion or combination of tandem stenosis and an incomplete circle of Willis);
2. To determine whether the observed pial collateral gap observed on the CTA head finally reaches the proximal thrombus on the delayed post contrast CTA head (considered fair collateral). However, this tissue may still be at risk for ischemic injury;
3. If the a pial collateral gap remains on the delayed post contrast head CTA, then tissue within the gap will likely be in the dense ischemic core and become a completed stroke (ischemic cascade plus glutamate cascade leading to liquefactive necrosis or sequestered infarct or both).
4. Given there is observably reasonable pial collateral, it does NOT ensure that there is perfusion of the underlying tissue. To assess whether the existing pial collateral actually perfuses the underlying brain parenchyma, a comparative analysis is made between the CT contrast density within the venocapillary pool in the affected region on the initial post contrast CTA with the CT density on the delayed post contrast CTA, and that is compared to unaffected comparable region on the contra lateral side. At-risk tissue (ischemic penumbra) will exhibit a partial rise in CT density between the 1st and the 2nd post contrast CTA, but it will not reach normal range compared to unaffected brain. Tissue that shows little or no rise in CT density in the venocapillary pool will be within the dense ischemic core. The areas of significantly reduced & absent parenchymal contrast CT density are at higher risk of hemorrhagic conversion upon reperfusion (spontaneous or therapeutic). Note: analysis of the CT density in the venocapillary pool and CT perfusion are both approximations of tissue actual perfusion based on changes in concentration of the contrast media in tissue over time. Thus, an initial short-term high depth-duration oligemic event can occur, initiating the ischemic cascade. But the afferent block can quickly clear, which means tissue injury can be initiated, but the antegrade blood flow is restored. In this circumstance, tissue injury will have occurred, but the restroration of pial blood flow will appear as normal or near normal on both the CT perfusion and the CT density within the venocapillary pool. Thus, both the CTA and CT perfusion may underestimate tissue injury, which is why the stroke protocol MR is of value, since actual tissue injury will always show up, in some fashion, on MR diffusion sequences.
5. Given there is an ICA stenosis/occlusion, is there effective EC-IC collateral;
6. In the context of restricted intradural afferent arterial blood flow obstruction (in the absence of a primary stem occlusion), has regional hypoperfusion produced oligemia in the expected anastomotic border zones producing a watershed stroke pattern;
7. In the context of an ICA thrombosis, tandem stenoses, incomplete portions of circle of Willis, or a combination of these, is there a shift in the location of the anastomotic border zones such that oligemia produces an end-of the-line watershed stroke pattern. Low flow ischemia within the end-of the-line portion of a shifted watershed can account strokes that involve tissue not primarily affected by the thrombus.
8. To evaluate the state of venous egress, at least for the major veins (note: SWI is the most effective of assessing flow in the deep parenchymal medullary veins).
Prior Study
Non Contrast Head CT1. There is hyperacute intraluminal thrombus in a single mid insular M3 branch off the superior division Lt. MCA;
CT Perfusion
1. Focal area of minimally reduced CBV and CT density within the venocapillary pool in the mid left insula. This matches the territory of the acute branch thrombus on the noncontrast head CT.
2. The wider area of both prolonged TTP/MTT (compared to the CT) suggests that there is additional thrombus in the more proximal M3 trunk that is not currently hyperdense on CT.
CTA of the Neck
The CTA of the neck is negative for any source for embolization to the left MCA region.
CTA of the Head (using initial post contrast exam)
1. There is partial occlusion of the posterior trunk superior MCA division (non hyperdense) resulting in slower filling of arteries to the the posterior insula and distal M4 branches in the parietal and retrosylvian cortex. This matches the prolonged TTP/MTT and the hyperemic response to slow flow on the CT perfusion.
2. There is a single hyperdense artery to the central sulcus, which is hyperdense and does not fill in its’ initial segment. Retrograde pial collateral fills the distal part of this artery leaving a 1cm. area of pial collateral gap. This oligemic area includes the mid insula and adjacent intrasylvian cortex which corresponds to the lower motor cortex including the tongue region, which in this patient has produced dysarthria.
3. Since CTA reveals a more proximal non hyperdense segment of thrombus in the posterior superior division trunk, it is possible that the hyperacute (hyperdense) single arterial thrombus may be the result of clot lysis and secondary embolization.