Case Notes
History
79 year old female presenting with sudden onset symptoms including Rt. facial droop, Rt. side weakness; the patient was nonverbal and not following commands; there is known history of secondary diabetes with hyperlipidemia.Exam
MR stroke screen exam (FLAIR sequence) in this case the MR was obtained 6.5 hours after embolectomy and with new symptoms.
Head MR FLAIR sequence
Arterial stroke is not a single entity, but rather starts as an ictal event generating symptoms and then evolves. However, the ischemic process may have occurred earlier, but was clinically silent, and only becomes symptomatic following clot lysis with downstream secondary embolization or reperfusion hemorrhage. Likewise, collateralization begins immediately. If sufficient the ischemic event ends up as a TIA; if insufficient it ends up a stroke. However, the depth and duration of this event(s) determines whether there is a temporary neurologic deficit, a completed stroke (adds glutamate cascade with vasogenic edema), or a lesser ischemic injury (no glutamate cascade leaving only cytogenic edema). Thus, acute clinical stroke is actually an unstable dynamic process. The CTA venocapillary pool CT density provides information about depth of the ischemic injury at the time of the exam (i.e. is the venocapillary pool normal, or less than normal, or absent), but does not reflect the stroke-age.
MR FLAIR can provide information about stroke-age and depth and duration of the oligemic insult, but cannot distinguish these two effects. FLAIR becomes positive 2-3 hours after the stroke ictus from cytogenic edema (with minimal conspicuity). If the stroke is completed it becomes more positive (obvious conspicuity after 4-6 hours) with the onset of the proinflammatory response producing vasogenic edema. In essence, the conspicuity of FLAIR can reflect either the time of onset and the amount of ischemic injury. If there is no positive FLAIR the onset is either very early or the ischemic injury is minimal. If minimally positive the onset is either in the hyperacute timeframe or the depth of the stroke is less severe. If clearly positive, the stroke is passed the stroke therapy window and is likely likely to have moderate or greater ischemic injury. FLAIR positivity proceeds over time peaking in the acute phase (3 hours to 3 days). Thus, FLAIR adds useful information about the stroke timeline and/or the stroke depth and duration only during the initial period of stroke stabilization or if there has been a new event with progression of clinical findings. Findings on FLAIR, as used in this discussion, is graded as if on a stroke-age timeline (not positive=very early, somewhat positive=early, clearly positive=outside the treatment window). However, the FLAIR conspicuity could just as well be based on the stroke depth and duration (minimal, moderate, or advanced). Nevertheless, the less obvious the FLAIR the earlier the ischemic event for determining stroke therapy or the lesser the stroke injury (which is always good). It is up to the imager to use FLAIR conspicuity language to best fit the clinical context usually determined by timing of the MR exam relative to the stroke ictus and the interval from the CTA.
Purpose
1. Use FLAIR sequence to confirm recognizable ischemic arterial zone or zones (similar to the DWI scenario).
2. Use FLAIR to estimate the most likely stroke-age and/or depth of the ischemic injury based on the conspicuity of the FLAIR compared to the DWI sequences.
3. Use FLAIR to detect thrombus or prior recanalized thrombus (hyperintensity) in the wall of proximal arteries.
4. Use FLAIR to detect focal mass effect and/or whether there is herniation or impending herniation of brain.
Head MR FLAIR sequence
Arterial stroke is not a single entity, but rather starts as an ictal event generating symptoms and then evolves. However, the ischemic process may have occurred earlier, but was clinically silent, and only becomes symptomatic following clot lysis with downstream secondary embolization or reperfusion hemorrhage. Likewise, collateralization begins immediately. If sufficient the ischemic event ends up as a TIA; if insufficient it ends up a stroke. However, the depth and duration of this event(s) determines whether there is a temporary neurologic deficit, a completed stroke (adds glutamate cascade with vasogenic edema), or a lesser ischemic injury (no glutamate cascade leaving only cytogenic edema). Thus, acute clinical stroke is actually an unstable dynamic process. The CTA venocapillary pool CT density provides information about depth of the ischemic injury at the time of the exam (i.e. is the venocapillary pool normal, or less than normal, or absent), but does not reflect the stroke-age.
MR FLAIR can provide information about stroke-age and depth and duration of the oligemic insult, but cannot distinguish these two effects. FLAIR becomes positive 2-3 hours after the stroke ictus from cytogenic edema (with minimal conspicuity). If the stroke is completed it becomes more positive (obvious conspicuity after 4-6 hours) with the onset of the proinflammatory response producing vasogenic edema. In essence, the conspicuity of FLAIR can reflect either the time of onset and the amount of ischemic injury. If there is no positive FLAIR the onset is either very early or the ischemic injury is minimal. If minimally positive the onset is either in the hyperacute timeframe or the depth of the stroke is less severe. If clearly positive, the stroke is passed the stroke therapy window and is likely likely to have moderate or greater ischemic injury. FLAIR positivity proceeds over time peaking in the acute phase (3 hours to 3 days). Thus, FLAIR adds useful information about the stroke timeline and/or the stroke depth and duration only during the initial period of stroke stabilization or if there has been a new event with progression of clinical findings. Findings on FLAIR, as used in this discussion, is graded as if on a stroke-age timeline (not positive=very early, somewhat positive=early, clearly positive=outside the treatment window). However, the FLAIR conspicuity could just as well be based on the stroke depth and duration (minimal, moderate, or advanced). Nevertheless, the less obvious the FLAIR the earlier the ischemic event for determining stroke therapy or the lesser the stroke injury (which is always good). It is up to the imager to use FLAIR conspicuity language to best fit the clinical context usually determined by timing of the MR exam relative to the stroke ictus and the interval from the CTA.
Purpose
1. Use FLAIR sequence to confirm recognizable ischemic arterial zone or zones (similar to the DWI scenario).
2. Use FLAIR to estimate the most likely stroke-age and/or depth of the ischemic injury based on the conspicuity of the FLAIR compared to the DWI sequences.
3. Use FLAIR to detect thrombus or prior recanalized thrombus (hyperintensity) in the wall of proximal arteries.
4. Use FLAIR to detect focal mass effect and/or whether there is herniation or impending herniation of brain.
Prior Study
Final Impression for entire CTA1. Proximal left M1/M2 thrombus with reasonable pial collateral (pial collateral reaches the proximal thrombus on the delayed head CT.
2. There remains evidence of persistent significant oligemia mainly in the lateral lenticulostriate perfusion zone (likely completed stroke). Persistent, but not as dense as the lateral basal ganglia but consistent with ischemic penumbra) is the oligemia remaining in the anterior insular and lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Lesser oligemia (tissue at risk) is evident the remaining superior division to the posterior insular and lateral cortical territories.
3. The persistently oligemic sites in the rostral M3-MCA perfusion zones likely affect the white matter deep to Broca’s area, the uncinate fasiculus, the premotor cortex, and the facial portion of the primary motor cortex.
4. The combination of a focal 50-60% stenosis of the proximal right cervical ICA combined with incomplete circle of Willis has shifted the watershed zone to the anterior insular and lateral orbitofrontal areas (end of the line watershed oligemic pattern), which likely contributes to the reduced CT density in these areas.
5. There is a greater than 2 cm suspicious nodule in the left thyroid.
Concurrent MR diffusion
1. There is positive diffusion in the same areas corresponding to sites of reduced CBV and CT perfusion and reduced venocapillary pool on the delayed CTA consistent with post ischemic parenchymal injury in the left lateral basal ganglia/caudate body/centrum semiovle, in the lateral orbitofrontal, and in the anterior insula and much of the superior division of the left MCA to the operculum and lateral cortex. However, the degree of positivity is variable with the least prominent (lesser ischemia) involving in the posterior insula and all of the superior division MCA supplied lateral cortex. The most prominent (worst ischemia) is in the perfusion zone of the M1/2 lateral lenticulostriate perforators and the anterior insula.
2. There is reperfusion hemorrhage into the lateral lenticulostriate perfusion zone, which was positive on DWI but also had significantly reduced CT density within its’ venocapillary pool on delayed CTA.
3. There is minimal subfalcine brain shift secondary to post ischemic cytogenic swelling plus the hematoma in the lateral lenticulostriate perfusion zone.